Evidence Hub

ISiCLE: A Quantum Chemistry Pipeline for Establishing in Silico Collision Cross Section Libraries

Sean Colby, Dennis Thomas, Jamie Nuñez, Douglas J. Baxter, Kurt R. Glaesemann, Joseph Brown, Megan Pirrung, Niranjan Govind et al.

OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information), 2018

2 citations

Abstract

High throughput, comprehensive, and confident identifications of metabolites and other chemicals in biological and envi-ronmental samples will revolutionize our understanding of the role of these intriguing and chemically diverse molecules in biological systems. Despite recent technological advances, a metabolomics study still results in the detection of a dispropor-tionate number of features than cannot be confidently assigned to a chemical structure. This inadequacy is driven by the sin-gle most significant limitation in metabolomics: the reliance on reference libraries constructed through the analysis of au-thentic reference chemicals and the limited commercial availability of these compounds. To this end, we have developed the in silico chemical library engine (ISiCLE), a high-performance computing-friendly cheminformatics workflow for generating chemical properties. In the instantiation described here, we predict probable three-dimensional molecular conformers (i.e. conformational isomers) using chemical identifiers as input, from which collision cross sections (CCS) are derived. The ap-proach employs state-of-the-art first-principles simulation, distinguished by use of molecular dynamics, quantum chemistry, and ion mobility calculations to generate predictions, all without training data. Importantly, optimization of ISiCLE includ-ed a refactoring of the popular MOBCAL code for trajectory-based mobility calculations, improving its computational effi-ciency by over two…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free