From information to physics to biology
Abstract
Commentary to "The gene: An appraisal" by Keith Baverstock. PBMB, Volume 164, September 2021, Pages 46-62. NOTE: this short and informal commentary constructively criticizes the very interesting approach in the paper by a brief survey of the work that a few of us develop since several years. I will first recall the very pertinent critique of the Modern Synthesis and the genocentric approach presented in the paper, then suggest a methodological (and theoretical) critique of the approach by K. Baverstock and hint to alternatives paths that are compatible, but "extend" the physics for biology presented by the author. The purposes and the space allowed force a limited number of references and technical details. These may be found in the references contained in the few papers quoted below that are not the most nor the only representative contributions to the that work, but are inserted as a source of references or as synthetic presentations of our views.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Preliminary Toxicity Analysis of 3DCRT versus IMRT on the High Dose Arm of the RTOG 0126 Prostate Cancer Trial
- Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Clinical Outcomes from a Prospective Trial
- American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263: Standardizing Nomenclatures in Radiation Oncology
- Motion Management Strategies and Technical Issues Associated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Thoracic and Upper Abdominal Tumors: A Review from NRG Oncology
- High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial
- Highly efficient training, refinement, and validation of a knowledge-based plan quality control system for radiotherapy clinical trials
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.