Evidence Hub

Does enforcing physics improve evapotranspiration downscaling? A controlled comparison of mass-conserving and direct deep-learning models for WaPOR

Kiala¹ Z, Bergaoui K, Schmitter P, Andarcia MG

2026

Abstract

Abstract Satellite evapotranspiration products underpin agricultural water accounting. Yet the field-scale (20 m) data irrigation needs exist for only a handful of sites, whereas coarse (≈ 300 m) products span the entire African continent. This motivates deep-learning downscaling of the continental product to field scale. Physics-informed networks that enforce hard conservation constraints are widely advocated, on the premise that they improve accuracy and transfer. Yet this premise is rarely tested in a controlled way. To our knowledge, this is the first controlled test of it for evapotranspiration downscaling. It is also the first to adapt image-restoration and geospatial foundation models to the task, and to transfer across contrasting African agro-climates. We downscale WaPOR actual evapotranspiration (ETa) from Level-1 (≈ 300 m) to Level-3 (20 m). Inputs, training, sites, and protocol are held fixed across ten African irrigation pilots. We compare three direct super-resolution models (a compact SwinIR transformer, a Prithvi Vision Transformer, and their ensemble) against a physics-compliant network (PRSN). Direct models explain 78–91% of L3 ETa variance and transfer zero-shot to unseen agro-climates. They roughly halve naive-upsampling error and beat an operational per-pixel baseline. A compact 1.8 M-parameter SwinIR matches the 300 M-parameter Prithvi foundation model. The physics-compliant models keep their guarantees but are less accurate at every site, by ≈ 6% to ≈…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free