Evidence Hub

Physics-Driven Deep Learning for Computational Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Combining physics and machine learning for improved medical imaging

K. Hammernik, Thomas Küstner, Burhaneddin Yaman, Zheng-Nan Huang, D. Rueckert, F. Knoll, M. Akçakaya

IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2022

146 citations

Abstract

Physics-driven deep learning methods have emerged as a powerful tool for computational magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) problems, pushing reconstruction performance to new limits. This article provides an overview of the recent developments in incorporating physics information into learning-based MRI reconstruction. We consider inverse problems with both linear and nonlinear forward models for computational MRI and review the classical approaches for solving these. We then focus on physics-driven deep learning approaches, covering physics-driven loss functions, plug-and-play (PnP) methods, generative models, and unrolled networks. We highlight domain-specific challenges, such as real- and complex-valued building blocks of neural networks, and translational applications in MRI with linear and nonlinear forward models. Finally, we discuss common issues and open challenges, and we draw connections to the importance of physics-driven learning when combined with other downstream tasks in the medical imaging pipeline.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a review, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free