Evidence Hub

Preliminary Investigations of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Effects on Neurophysiology and Behavior

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2024

44 participants

Abstract

The objective of this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover study is to evaluate the effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) on complex cognitive task performance in healthy adult volunteers.

The primary questions this study aims to answer are:

1. Does tES improve task performance, including speed, accuracy, and overall success, during a computerized track-and-capture task?

2. Do different stimulation targets produce differential effects on performance?

3. Are there short-term post-stimulation effects on task performance (up to 48 hours)?

Participants will:

1. Complete two testing sessions under either active or sham stimulation conditions.

2. Perform a complex operational task involving dual-hand controllers while undergoing tES or sham stimulation, and immediately after.

3. Return for follow-up task performance assessments at 24 and 48 hours post-stimulation to evaluate after-effects.

Conditions: Healthy, Brain Stimulation, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), Cognition, Psychomotor Performance, Neurophysiology.

Primary outcome: ROBoT-r Task Performance Score (During Stimulation); ROBoT-r Task Performance Score (Post-Stimulation); ROBoT-r Task Performance Score (Post-Stimulation Follow-up).

Enrollment: 44 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 44 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free