Evidence Hub

Light Physics Enhanced Camera Navigation in No-touch Hysteroscopy: Randomized Controlled Trial

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2019

96 participants

Abstract

Office hysteroscopy is the gold standard technique in the diagnosis of the intrauterine pathologies. Some interventions may also be carried out through the hysteroscopy. No-touch hysteroscopy technique confers several advantages in terms of patient discomfort over the traditional technique. Clinicians performing the hysteroscopy find their way from the vaginal introitus to the uterine cavity through direct visualization of the anatomic structures on their route. The investigators hypothesize that the utilization of the information derived from the 'light physics' would facilitate camera navigation during no-touch hysteroscopy and consequently ease reaching the uterus. This study aimed to compare the standard no-touch technique with the 'light physics' enhanced camera navigation in terms of patient comfort and procedural pain.

Conditions: Infertility.

Primary outcome: Procedural Pain; Procedure time.

Enrollment: 96 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 96 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free