Evidence Hub

Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Training on Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Function in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Yang X, Shi X, Xue X, Deng Z

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2023

1,275 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the effect of robot-assisted training (RAT) on upper limb function recovery in patients with stroke, providing the evidence-based medical basis for the clinical application of RAT.

DATA SOURCES: We searched online electronic databases up to June 2022, including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, WanFang Data, CNKI, and VIP full-text databases.

STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials of the effect of RAT on upper extremity functional recovery in patients with stroke.

DATA EXTRACTION: The Cochrane Collaboration Tool for Assessing the Risk of Bias was used to assess study quality and risk of bias.

DATA SYNTHESIS: Fourteen randomized controlled trials involving 1275 patients were included for review. Compared with the control group, RAT significantly improved upper limb motor function and daily living ability. The overall differences were statistically significant, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE; standard mean difference=0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.34, 1.05; P=.0001), modified Barthel Index (standard mean difference=0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.75, 1.15; P<.00001), whereas the differences in modified Ashworth Scale, FIM, and Wolf Motor Function Test scores were not statistically significant.

SUBGROUP ANALYSIS: Compared with the control group, the differences between FMA-UE and modified Barthel Index at 4 and 12 weeks of RAT, there were statistically significant, the differences…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,275 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free