Evidence Hub

Metaanalysis of intraocular lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery in myopic eyes

Chen X, Yuan F, Wu L

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2016

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation methods after laser refractive surgery in myopic eyes, a comprehensive literature search was carried out for retrospective case series studies with data on post-myopic laser surgery IOL power calculations published from January 2000 to May 2014. A metaanalysis of the 9 identified studies was performed using odds ratios in percentage of prediction error within ±0.5 or 1.0 diopter (D) of the target refraction. Compared with the Haigis-L method, the clinical history method, corneal bypass method, and Feiz-Mannis method were associated with lower odds of predication; the Masket method showed higher odds. The subgroup data showed significantly better performance of the Shammas no-history method with the Shammas post-LASIK formula than the Haigis-L method in predication error. The Masket method and the Shammas no-history method with the Shammas post-LASIK formula without historical data had more prediction accuracy than the Haigis-L method. The clinical history method, Feiz-Mannis method, and corneal bypass method, which required historical data, were less accurate in their predictions.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free