Evidence Hub

Evidence-based methods in motor rehabilitation after stroke

Liepert J

Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie, 2012

Abstract

In this review, treatments for motor rehabilitation after stroke will be presented. In particular, randomised, controlled trials, meta-analyses and systematic reviews, mainly from the years 2009 - 2011, were taken into consideration. In summary, evidence is best for constraint-induced movement therapy and Botulinum toxin type A in patients with focal spasticity. Superiority has been demonstrated for the administration of drugs (serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and L-dopa), mirror therapy, the use of virtual reality, electromechanical devices to restore independent walking, and fitness and circuit training. Other therapies (bilateral arm training, treadmill therapy, robot-assisted arm therapy) did not show superiority. For sensory training and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation large clinical studies still need to be done.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free