Evidence Hub

Preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage luminal breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis (PRELUMEN)

Viani GA, Arruda CV, Hamamura AC, Cardoso CE, Salmon HA, Amaral GO

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2026

428 participants

Abstract

Background and purpose: Preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a precision locoregional strategy for early luminal breast cancer, yet no quantitative meta-analysis exists in this subtype. We aimed to estimate the pooled pathological complete response (pCR) rate, identify its predictors through meta-regression, and characterise safety and cosmetic outcomes.

Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials of preoperative SBRT in patients with clinical stage T1-T2 N0-N1 luminal (ER-positive, HER2-negative) breast cancer was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Random-effects models with REML estimation were fitted on logit-transformed proportions. Univariable meta-regression analyses examined absorbed dose (BED_4), irradiation-to-surgery interval, fractionation, technique, and biological tumor characteristics as covariates.

Results: Eleven prospective studies (428 patients) were included. Eight trials (N = 277) reported pCR data, yielding a pooled pCR rate of 21.4 % (95 % CI: 12.1-35.1 %; I2 = 77.0 %). The irradiation-to-surgery interval was the sole statistically significant predictor of pCR (β = +0.045 per week; p 2 = 98.9 %), whilst BED_4, fractionation, and technique showed no independent association. Pooled late grade ≥ 3 toxicity was 5.9 % (95 % CI: 3.7-9.1 %) and excellent or good cosmesis was achieved in 88.3 % of patients (95 % CI: 79.4-93.6 %).

Conclusion: Preoperative SBRT achieves a clinically…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 428 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free