Evidence Hub

Glymphatic system dysfunction in gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis of DTI-ALPS index

Dehaghi FT, Nasab AS, Arabi N, Abedi I

Journal of neuroradiology = Journal de neuroradiologie, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Background: The glymphatic system's role in brain waste clearance is increasingly recognized in glioma pathophysiology. This study synthesizes evidence on DTI-ALPS index variations across glioma grades, molecular subtypes, and clinical outcomes to evaluate its diagnostic and prognostic utility.

Methods: Following PRISMA 2020, major databases were searched up to December 20, 2025, for studies of adults with histologically confirmed gliomas who underwent DTI-ALPS assessment. Risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-E, and reporting quality using the STROBE checklist. Random-effects meta-analyses examined ALPS differences for six different outcome comparisons.

Results: Fourteen studies were included. ROBINS-E revealed very high risk of bias in 14% of studies and some concerns in 64%; mean STROBE compliance was 92.2%. High-grade gliomas exhibited lower ALPS indices than low-grade tumors (MD=0.14, 95% CI: 0.11-0.16; I2=0%). IDH wild-type gliomas showed lower ALPS indices than IDH-mutant tumors (MD=0.14, 95% CI: 0.10-0.18; I2=38%). Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that lower ALPS index is associated with worse overall survival (HR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.49-1.10; I2=57%).

Conclusion: DTI-ALPS index reliably detects glymphatic dysfunction in gliomas and provides prognostic information, supporting its use as a non-invasive biomarker for glioma assessment. However, methodological standardization and prospective multicenter studies are needed for clinical integration.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free