Evidence Hub

Proton radiotherapy outcomes in pediatric ependymoma: A long-term meta-analysis (PROPEL)

Viani GA, Hamamura AC, Arruda CV, Cardoso CE, Salmon HA, Amaral GO

Critical reviews in oncology/hematology, 2026

1,100 participants

Abstract

Objectives: To synthesize existing evidence on pencil-beam and passive-scattering proton therapy outcomes in pediatric intracranial ependymoma and to generate pooled estimates of five-year overall survival (OS), local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and late toxicity profiles.

Materials and methods: We performed a random-effects meta-analysis (with fixed- and random-effects estimates converging when between-study heterogeneity was negligible) of eight retrospective single-center cohorts (2000-2025) encompassing 1100 children treated with 54-60 Gy(RBE) proton therapy. Primary endpoints were five-year OS, LC, and PFS. Secondary endpoints included growth hormone deficiency (GHD), hypothyroidism, radionecrosis, and secondary malignancies. Pooled proportions and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed via Cochran's Q and I² statistics. Meta-regression evaluated the influence of surgical extent, proton dose, and delivery technique on oncologic endpoints.

Results: Five-year OS was 83.1 % (95 % CI 80.7-85.4 %), LC 84.9 % (95 % CI 82.7-87.2 %), and PFS 74.1 % (95 % CI 71.3-76.9 %), each with negligible heterogeneity (I² = 0 %). Late toxicities were modest: GHD in 21.3 % (95 % CI 18.8-23.8 %), hypothyroidism in 15.0 % (95 % CI 12.9-17.1 %), ototoxicity grade 2 or higher in 5 % (95 % CI 3.5-6.5 %), radionecrosis in 2.0 % (95 % CI 1.5-3.5 %), and secondary malignancy in 0.65 % (95 % CI 0.17-1.13 %).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free