Evidence Hub

Reduced-Dose Total Skin Electron Beam Radiation Therapy in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abai S, Danzer MF, Assaf C, Mula-Hussain L, Kirova Y, Kouloulias V, Cowan R, Newman NB et al.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2026

883 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of T-cell neoplastic entities associated with significant morbidity and high radiosensitivity. Although research on reduced-dose radiation treatment for mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome has significantly increased over the past 2 decades, randomized data are lacking. We aim to summarize the available evidence and analyze the safety and efficacy of reduced-dose total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT).

Methods and materials: A literature search for evidence was conducted, selecting studies with reduced-dose TSEBT in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome that met the inclusion criteria. The studies were critically appraised, and the results were synthesized and interpreted.

Results: The analyzed data comprised 11 prospective studies and 11 retrospective studies, with a total of 883 patients. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled overall response rate of 91% (95% CI, 88-93) and complete response rate of 26% (95% CI, 21-31) to reduced-dose TSEBT. The most common toxicities reported were grade 1 and 2 skin reactions. Documented in 7 studies, the time to response ranged from 4 to 8 weeks. Seven studies evaluated the impact of reduced-dose TSEBT on quality of life, and all reported significant improvements in 1 or more subdomains. Fourteen studies indicated that 337 patients (38%) received consolidation/subsequent therapy after TSEBT to maintain remission. Compared with TSEBT monotherapy, the addition of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 883 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free