Evidence Hub

The Role of MRI as a key evaluator of mesenchymal stem Cell Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Elhaie M, Koozari A, Mozafari M, Abedi I

Journal of neuroradiology = Journal de neuroradiologie, 2025

48 participants

Abstract

Background: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated disorder marked by inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration, necessitating regenerative therapies. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy offers immunomodulatory and neuroprotective potential, but clinical evaluation is challenging.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis, registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251017175) and following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, evaluated MRI's role in assessing MSC therapy for MS. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, screening 1687 records. Nine peer-reviewed clinical studies (n = 7-48 MS patients) were included. MRI modalities (e.g., T1/T2-weighted, diffusion tensor imaging) and outcomes (e.g., lesion load, remyelination) were analyzed narratively and quantitatively using Review Manager 5.1.

Results: Conventional MRI detected short-term reductions in lesion load and inflammation, while advanced techniques showed microstructural repair, notably with intrathecal MSCs. An exploratory Meta-analysis of four studies found a significant T2 lesion volume decrease (mean difference -5.12 mm³, 95 % CI -9.65 to -0.59, P = 0.03, I²=93 %) and higher likelihood of no new T2 lesions (risk ratio 1.69, 95 % CI 1.31-2.19, P < 0.0001, I²=0 %). High heterogeneity and small sample sizes limited findings.

Conclusion: MRI shows promise as a biomarker for MSC therapy efficacy in MS, capturing lesion dynamics. Larger, standardized trials are needed to address…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 48 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free