Evidence Hub

Soluble immune checkpoints in lung cancer: linking prognostic signatures to immunotherapy response - a meta-analysis

Rotariu LM, Alexa-Stratulat T, Tanasa R, Pavel-Tanasa M

Frontiers in immunology, 2026

1,967 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death, with most patients diagnosed at advanced, unresectable stages. Although immune-checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the therapeutic landscape, only a subset of patients achieves meaningful and sustained benefit. In this context, circulating soluble immune-checkpoints, particularly soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) have emerged as promising non-invasive biomarkers with potential prognostic and predictive value.

Methods: To clarify their relevance, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 2015 and 2025, evaluating the association between serum levels of these biomarkers and clinical outcomes in NSCLC. A total of 20 studies including 1967 patients were analyzed, despite heterogeneity in study design and treatment regimens.

Results: Lower baseline sPD-L1 levels consistently correlated with longer progression-free (PFS: random effect model with a pooled HR of 2.26 [95% CI: 1.77-2.87, p < 0.0001]) and overall survival (OS: random effect model with a pooled HR of 2.04 [95% CI 1.55-2.68, p < 0.0001]), whereas elevated concentrations were frequently observed in males, smokers, individuals with advanced disease, and those with liver metastases. Associations between soluble checkpoints and tumor histology, mutational status, or tissue PD-L1 expression varied widely across studies.

Conclusions: Overall, our findings highlight baseline sPD-L1 with a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,967 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free