Evidence Hub

Children's outcomes in medulloblastoma proton versus photon craniospinal radiotherapy (CURE): meta-analysis

Viani GA, Hamamura AC, Arruda CV, Cardoso CE, Salmon HA, Amaral GO

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2026

1,034 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with proton (PBT) versus photon (PHT) therapy in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma, evaluating overall survival (OS), growth hormone deficiency (GHD), hypothyroidism, neurocognitive decline, and ototoxicity.

Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. Retrospective or prospective cohort studies comparing PBT versus PHT-CSI in children (<21 years) with medulloblastoma were included. Outcomes were OS, GHD, hypothyroidism, neurocognitive decline (full-scale IQ), and ototoxicity (grade ≥ 3). Data from 12 studies were extracted and analyzed using a fixed-effects model, calculating risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes and standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q test and I2 statistic.

Results: Ten cohort studies were included (no randomized trials), including 1034 patients (PBT = 537 and PHT = 497). No difference in OS was observed (RR: 0.984; 95 % CI: 0.902-1.073; p = 0.7118; I2 = 0 %). PBT significantly reduced GHD (RR: 0.379; p < 0.001, NNT = 2), hypothyroidism (RR: 0.256; p < 0.001, NNT = 2), and neurocognitive decline (SMD: 0.708; p = 0.0001, NNT = 5), with no difference in grade ≥ 3 ototoxicity (RR: 0.88; p = 0.5704). Grade ≤ 2 ototoxicity was increased with PHT (RR: 1.15; p = 0.01, NNT = 15).

Conclusion: PBT-CSI provides equivalent survival to PHT-CSI while…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,034 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free