Evidence Hub

The Prognostic Power of miR-21 in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Conte L, Tumolo MR, De Nunzio G, De Giorgi U, Guarino R, Cascio D, Cucci F

International journal of molecular sciences, 2025

6 citations

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common malignancies among women worldwide. Despite advances in early detection and treatment, prognosis remains highly variable. Molecular biomarkers, such as microRNAs (miRNAs), have emerged as promising tools to refine prognostic assessment. Among them, miR-21 is consistently overexpressed in solid tumors and implicated in key oncogenic pathways. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify the prognostic significance of miR-21 in BC and explore its molecular mechanisms through bioinformatic analyses. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to April 2025 identified 18 eligible observational studies. Pooled analyses showed that high miR-21 expression was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.42-3.98) and recurrence-related outcomes (DFS/RFS) (HR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.32-3.34). Subgroup analyses confirmed robust associations across different cut-off definitions and revealed particularly strong effects in triple-negative BC (HR = 5.69) and mixed subtypes (HR = 2.55), but no significant association in HER2-positive BC. Bioinformatic analysis identified target genes such as PTEN, BCL2, STAT3, and MYC, involved in apoptosis regulation, proliferation, NF-κB signaling, and immune modulation. These findings provide consistent evidence that miR-21 is a promising minimally invasive prognostic biomarker in BC, particularly in aggressive subtypes, and support its integration…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free