Evidence Hub

Conservative treatments for De Quervain's tenosynovitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Cuenca-Zaldívar JN, Martínez-Pozas O, Riba E, Rouafi H, Ucero-Lozano R, Selva-Sarzo F, Sinatti P, Cadeau Comte N et al.

Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists, 2026

1,178 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: De Quervain's tenosynovitis (DQT) is a common tendinopathy of the first dorsal compartment, managed conservatively or surgically. Among conservative options, the comparative effectiveness remains unclear.

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of conservative treatments for DQT.

Study design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods: Following PRISMA and a PROSPERO registration (CRD42023494486), seven databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. Twenty-one studies (1,178 adults) were included in the qualitative synthesis; 12 entered the NMA. Pain was measured with the visual analog scale or Numerical Pain Rating Scale; function with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, or the Duruöz Hand Index. Data were analyzed with frequentist multivariate and univariate NMAs. Interventions were ranked using p scores and the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria.

Results: Full-time orthosis use plus corticosteroid injection ranked highest for pain and functional improvement, followed by corticosteroid injection alone and acupuncture. All active treatments outperformed waitlist controls. Pain outcomes…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,178 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free