Evidence Hub

Liver Background Uptake of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-targeted PET Radiotracers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ulaner GA, Parihar AS, Calais J, Sutcliffe S, Schoones JW

Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2026

1,497 participants

Abstract

Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of liver background uptake across four prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting PET radiotracers (fluorine 18 [18F]-piflufolastat, gallium 68 [68Ga]-PSMA-11, 18F-flotufolastat, and 18F-PSMA-1007) and evaluate the potential impact on patient selection for PSMA-targeted therapy. Materials and Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane through May 12, 2025, to identify human studies reporting quantitative liver background uptake for the four PSMA-targeted PET radiotracers of interest. For each eligible study, liver background uptake was extracted as standardized uptake values (SUVs) and summarized and compared by radiotracer using random effects models with robust variance estimation. Results Among 652 unique records, 17 studies with 1497 total patients met inclusion criteria and reported liver background SUVs. Summary mean liver background SUV was 5.0 (95% CI: 3.6, 6.3) for 18F-piflufolastat, 5.1 (95% CI: 4.3, 5.9) for 68Ga-PSMA-11 (P = .579 compared with 18F-piflufolastat), 7.2 (95% CI: 6.3, 8.2) for 18F-flotufolastat (P = .005), and 12.1 (95% CI: 11.4, 12.9) for 18F-PSMA-1007 (P Keywords: PET, Genital/Reproductive, Prostate, 68Ga-PSMA-11, 18F-piflufolastat, 18F-flotufolastat, 18F-PSMA-1007, PSMA-targeted PET, PSMA-targeted Therapy Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2026.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,497 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free