Evidence Hub

Choroidal vascularity index as a marker of health and disease: systematic review and meta-analyses

Loh NC, Rojas-Carabali W, Lim YH, Bong JE, Villabona-Martinez V, Cifuentes-González C, Kumar M, Sadda S et al.

Survey of ophthalmology, 2026

7,316 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

The Choroidal Vascularity Index (CVI), derived from optical coherence tomography (OCT), has emerged as a potential biomarker for detecting vascular changes. Understanding its variability across physiological states, ocular conditions, and systemic diseases is crucial for its integration into clinical practice. We evaluated variations in CVI across different physiological states (e.g., first-trimester pregnancy), ocular conditions (e.g., age-related macular degeneration[AMD]), and systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus) compared to healthy controls. From 1210 identified articles, 63 studies (7316 participants: 4000 controls and 3316 cases) met inclusion criteria. Data covered 12 distinct conditions and physiological states. Most studies were conducted in Europe and Asia, predominantly using spectral-domain OCT machines with a low risk of bias. Increased CVI was seen in some physiological states (e.g., Valsalva maneuver, first-trimester pregnancy) and some disorders (e.g. active panuveitis, inactive thyroid eye disease). Reduced CVI was found in diabetes mellitus (both with or without diabetic retinopathy), hyperopic amblyopia, and AMD. CVI demonstrates potential as a biomarker to differentiate between physiological states and pathological conditions compared to healthy controls. These findings underscore the choroid's adaptive response to systemic and ocular challenges, highlighting CVI's relevance in understanding disease mechanisms and monitoring health.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 7,316 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free