Evidence Hub

ESTRO-ISRS clinical practice recommendations for re-irradiation of spinal metastases with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Delphi consensus supported by a systematic review and meta-analysis

Alongi F, Cuccia F, Kotecha R, Campione M, Louie AV, Ma L, Minniti G, Tree AC et al.

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2026

1,284 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an established treatment for previously unirradiated spinal metastases; however, the literature is limited with respect to SBRT as a re-irradiation salvage therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis as basis for joint ESTRO-ISRS clinical practice recommendations of salvage SBRT for spinal metastases.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using PRISMA methodology, including publications from January 2006 to September 2024, reporting on the clinical outcomes of ≥ 5 patients treated with spine SBRT re-irradiation (≥5 Gy per fraction) for vertebral metastases. These data served as basis for joint ESTRO-ISRS clinical practice recommendations.

Results: After the initial article screen, 20 studies (5 prospective, 15 retrospective) met the inclusion criteria for analysis. A total of 1538 spine metastases were treated in 1284 patients. The median re-irradiation dose was 24 Gy in 2 fractions (range: 16-30 Gy in 1-5 fractions) after a median 30 Gy in 10 fractions of prior conventional radiotherapy. Vertebral compression fracture, nerve root damage, and myelopathy events were observed in a pooled proportion of 5.0 %, 5.6 %, and 1.7 %, respectively. With a median follow-up of 12 months, the pooled 1- and 2-year LC rates were 81 % (95 % CI: 77-86 %) and 70 % (95 % CI: 61-79 %), respectively. Despite the low level of evidence, a consensus was reached after the first round of voting for 11 practice…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,284 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free