A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of co-offending characteristics
Abstract
Co-offending involves two or more individuals committing a crime together. It is influenced by social processes such as peer influence, group cohesion and strategic cooperation that shape the social dynamics of criminal behaviour. Studying co-offending helps to reveal how social interactions and relationships influence individuals' decisions to engage in crime. Here we conducted a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis on two measures of co-offending, prevalence and group size, using data from 110 included studies from 17 countries. The pooled effect of the prevalence of co-offences was 0.29 (95% credible interval (CrI) 0.22-0.35) based on a total sample of 45,973,445 offences, and the pooled effect of the prevalence of co-offenders was 0.50 (95% CrI 0.43-0.56) based on a total sample of 3,459,133 offenders. On average, most of the offences were committed by two people with a pooled average group size of 2.73 (95% CrI 2.63-2.84). Property crimes had a higher prevalence of co-offences and co-offenders compared with violent crimes, while the average group size was larger for violent offences. Young offenders were more likely to engage in co-offending compared with adult offenders, and offences committed by youth usually involved larger groups. Furthermore, male offenders tended to form larger groups than females. No notable differences were observed between male and female co-offenders in terms of the prevalence of co-offenders. Variations in reported measures across…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Preliminary Toxicity Analysis of 3DCRT versus IMRT on the High Dose Arm of the RTOG 0126 Prostate Cancer Trial
- Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Clinical Outcomes from a Prospective Trial
- American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263: Standardizing Nomenclatures in Radiation Oncology
- Motion Management Strategies and Technical Issues Associated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Thoracic and Upper Abdominal Tumors: A Review from NRG Oncology
- High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial
- Highly efficient training, refinement, and validation of a knowledge-based plan quality control system for radiotherapy clinical trials
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.