Evidence Hub

177Lu-labelled peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wang J, Pang X, Lian J, Lu H

Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026

1,844 participants

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-labelled peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis conducted a search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Included studies assessed treatment outcomes using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled proportions.

Results: A total of 14 studies with 1844 patients were included. The pooled disease control rate (DCR) was 87.6% (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 82.5%-92%), and the objective response rate (ORR) was 32.2% (95% CI, 25.4%-39.3%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 30.87 months (95% CI, 22.71-39.04), and median overall survival (OS) was 51.85 months (95% CI, 39.99-63.71). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly higher DCR in grade 1-2 NETs 97.7% (95% CI, 91.4%-100%) compared to grade 3 NETs 90.8% (95% CI, 85.1%-94.4%), and a higher ORR in grade 1-2 tumors 45.4% (95% CI, 35.3%-55.6%) compared to grade 3 tumors 27.1% (95% CI, 21.2%-33.4%). PFS was longer in pancreatic NETs 93.9 months (95% CI, 39.45-148.35) than in gastrointestinal NETs 66.32 months (95% CI, 41.78-90.87). The overall incidence of adverse events was 4.1%, with grade ≥3 toxicities in 4.3%. 177Lu-PRRT demonstrates high efficacy and a favorable safety profile in treating NETs.

Conclusion:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,844 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free