Evidence Hub

MRI-based radiomics models for early predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhang J, Wu Q, Lei P, Zhu X, Li B

Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025

8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective This meta‐analysis evaluates the accuracy of MRI‐based radiomics in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted up to September 2024. Ten studies meeting inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological quality using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and QUADAS‐2 tools. Pooled diagnostic performance metrics, including AUC, sensitivity, and specificity, were calculated using a fixed‐effects model. Results The fixed‐effects model yielded a pooled AUC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79–0.86), with sensitivity of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.68–0.88) and specificity of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76–0.91). Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) classifiers demonstrated the highest diagnostic efficacy (AUC = 0.86). Heterogeneity was low (I 2 = 32%), supporting the use of a fixed‐effects approach. Conclusion MRI‐based radiomics exhibits strong and consistent predictive performance for pCR in TNBC patients undergoing NAC, supporting its potential as a non‐invasive tool for early treatment response assessment. Further standardization and prospective validation are needed for clinical implementation.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free