Determinants of Health Care Technology Adoption Using an Integrated Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Task Technology Fit Model: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Health care technology adoption is key to improving patient care, enhancing operational efficiency, and ensuring better health outcomes. Examining the determinants that influence the acceptance and sustainable use of health care technologies is crucial for system developers, health care providers, and policymakers. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and task-technology fit (TTF) theoretical models offer a comprehensive framework to assess these determinants systematically, with UTAUT focusing on usage intentions (UI) and TTF emphasizing task-technology alignment for system usefulness, usability, and satisfaction.
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify and analyze the key factors influencing the adoption of health care technologies based on an integrated UTAUT and TTF framework. By synthesizing existing literature, the study seeks to provide valuable insights for stakeholders to implement innovative and effective solutions in the health care domain.
Methods: A search was conducted across a range of databases, including MEDLINE and Embase, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria covered studies applying either the UTAUT model, the TTF model, or both to health care technology adoption, published in English between 2012 and 2025. Exclusion criteria included nonquantitative studies, studies not focused on a health care setting, and those lacking…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 20,723 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Preliminary Toxicity Analysis of 3DCRT versus IMRT on the High Dose Arm of the RTOG 0126 Prostate Cancer Trial
- Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Clinical Outcomes from a Prospective Trial
- American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263: Standardizing Nomenclatures in Radiation Oncology
- Motion Management Strategies and Technical Issues Associated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Thoracic and Upper Abdominal Tumors: A Review from NRG Oncology
- High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial
- Highly efficient training, refinement, and validation of a knowledge-based plan quality control system for radiotherapy clinical trials
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.