Evidence Hub

Impact of obstructive sleep apnea on early renal injury biomarkers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Xia M, Liu T, Chang F, Salanitro M, Wessel N, Penzel T

Sleep medicine, 2026

4,302 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is increasingly recognized as a potential contributor to early renal injury. However, whether OSA independently affects kidney function in individuals without known kidney disease remains uncertain. Early identification of subclinical renal damage is crucial for timely intervention.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to July 7, 2025. Eligible studies included adults without diagnosed chronic kidney disease and reported at least one renal biomarker. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and correlation coefficients were converted to Fisher z-scores for pooling.

Results: Twenty-six studies with 4302 participants were included. Compared to non-OSA controls, OSA patients exhibited significantly higher levels of urinary microalbumin (UmAlb) (SMD = 0.79), cystatin C (CysC) (SMD = 0.47), urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) (SMD = 0.49), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) (SMD = 0.34), and interleukin-18 (IL-18) (SMD = 2.27) (all P 2-MG and L-FABP were only described qualitatively due to insufficient data for pooling. Subgroup analyses showed stronger biomarker elevations in severe OSA and hypertensive individuals. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and hypoxia indices correlated positively with biomarker levels.

Conclusions: OSA was associated with multiple…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,302 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free