Evidence Hub

Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies in bipolar disorder in resting state: A coordinates-based meta-analysis

Nan X, Li W, Wang L

Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging, 2024

1,112 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

Exploring changes in the intrinsic activity of the brain in people with bipolar disorder (BD) is necessary. However, the findings have not yet led to consistent conclusions. In this regard, this paper aims to extract more obvious differential brain areas and neuroimaging markers, for the purpose of providing assistance for early clinical diagnosis and subsequent treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis of whole-brain resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) studies using seed-based d-mapping software that examined differences in amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF), fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF), and regional homogeneity (ReHo) between patients with BD and healthy controls (HCs). Seed-based d-Mapping (formerly Signed Differential Mapping) with Permutation of Subject Images, or SDM-PSI, is a statistical technique for meta-analyzing studies of differences in brain activity or structure. A total of 16 articles involving 1112 individuals were included in this study for meta-analysis. This paper confidently analyzes the correlation between the clinical scales HAMD, HAMA, and YMRS, and the area of difference. We found significant changes that increased activation in the anterior connective and left lens nucleus, the nucleus of the shell, and BA 48 in BD patients compared with HC (P < 0.05, uncorrected), as well as a significant correlation between HAMD and the left superior frontal gyrus (after FWE correction P < 0.05).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,112 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free