Evidence Hub

Focal cortical dysplasia detection by artificial intelligence using MRI: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dashtkoohi M, Ghadimi DJ, Moodi F, Behrang N, Khormali E, Salari HM, Cohen NT, Gholipour T et al.

Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2025

9 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is a common cause of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. However, it can be challenging to detect FCD using MRI alone. This study aimed to review and analyze studies that used machine learning and artificial neural networks (ANN) methods as an additional tool to enhance MRI findings in FCD patients.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in four databases (Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). The quality of the studies was assessed using QUADAS-AI, and a bivariate random-effects model was used for analysis. The main outcome analyzed was the sensitivity and specificity of patient-wise outcomes. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using I2.

Results: A total of 41 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 24 ANN-based studies and 17 machine learning studies. Meta-analysis of internal validation datasets showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.92 for AI-based models in detecting FCD lesions. Meta-analysis of external validation datasets yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.66. There was moderate heterogeneity among studies in the external validation dataset, but no significant publication bias was found.

Conclusion: Although there is an increasing number of machine learning and ANN-based models for FCD detection, their clinical applicability remains limited. Further refinement and optimization, along with longitudinal studies, are needed to ensure their integration into clinical practice.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free