Evidence Hub

Radiosurgical management of cavernous sinus hemangioma: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guideline

E. Akdemir, Yanjia Zhang, S. Yomo, L. Fariselli, Alessandra Gorgulho, M. Levivier, Lijun Ma, I. Paddick et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2025

324 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cavernous sinus hemangiomas (CSHs) are rare benign vascular tumors and surgical resection carries substantial risks of morbidity and mortality. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated SRS (FSRS) have emerged as an effective non-invasive surgical alternative; however, appropriate patient selection, dosing, and outcomes remain unclear and underreported.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SRS/FSRS for CSHs. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed of peer-reviewed studies reporting outcomes of SRS or FSRS (≤5 fractions) in patients with histologically or radiographically-confirmed CSH published from January 1999 to August 2024. Primary outcomes included local tumor control (LC) and radiographic response, while secondary outcomes assessed symptom improvement and treatment-related toxicities.

RESULTS

A TOTAL OF 16 STUDIES COMPRISING 324 PATIENTS WERE INCLUDED: 14 SRS (282 patients) and 2 FSRS (42 patients). The crude LC was 100% in the entire cohort and the pooled substantial radiographic response rate (>50% reduction) was 85.0% (95% CI: 68-94%, I² = 67%) for 14 studies. Among those with symptoms (13 studies, 202 patients), the pooled symptom improvement rate was 98.0% (95% CI: 87.0-100.0%, I2 < 1%). Meta-regression revealed a significant positive association between definitive SRS/FSRS and symptom improvement (vs. adjuvant treatment).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 324 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free