Evidence Hub

Clinical outcomes following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for Non-Spinal Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Raj Singh, A. Valluri, E. Lehrer, Yilin Cao, Rituraj Upadhyay, D. Trifiletti, Simon Lo, K. Redmond et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2024

528 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited data available on clinical outcomes following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-spinal bone metastases. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize local control (LC), overall survival (OS), pain response rates, and toxicity following SBRT.

METHODS

Primary outcomes were 1-year LC, incidences of acute and late Grade 3-5 toxicities, and overall pain response rate at 3 months. The secondary outcome was 1-year OS. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was employed for assessment of study bias, with a median score of 5⋆ for included studies (range: 4-8). Weighted random effects meta-analyses were conducted to estimate effect sizes.

RESULTS

We identified 528 patients with 597 non-spinal bone lesions across 9 studies, 1 prospective and 8 retrospective observational, treated with SBRT. The estimated 1-year LC rate was 94.6% (95% CI: 87.0-99.0%). The estimated 3-month combined partial and complete pain response rate following SBRT was 87.7% (95% CI: 55.1-100.0%). The estimated combined acute and late Grade 3-5 toxicity rate was 0.5% (95% CI: 0-5.0%) with an estimated pathologic fracture rate of 3.1% (95% CI: 0.2-9.1%). The estimated 1-year OS rate was 71.0% (95% CI: 51.7-87.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT resulted in excellent LC and palliation of symptoms with minimal related toxicity. Prospective investigations are warranted to further characterizes long-term outcomes with SBRT for patients with non-spinal bone metastases.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 528 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free