Evidence Hub

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: meta-analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society practice guidelines

S. Bae, S. Chun, Joo-Hyun Chung, Eunji Kim, Jin-kyu Kang, W. Jang, J. Moon, I. Roquette et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2023

1,889 participants · 105 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis reports on outcomes and hepatic toxicity rates following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver confined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and presents consensus guidelines regarding appropriate patient management.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic review was performed from articles reporting outcomes at ≥5 years published prior to October 2022 from the Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases using the key words terms ("Stereotactic body radiotherapy" OR "SBRT" OR "SABR" OR "Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy") AND ("Hepatocellular carcinoma" OR "HCC"). An aggregated data (AD) meta-analysis was conducted to assess overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) using weighted random effects models. In addition, an individual patient data (IPD) analysis incorporating data from 6 institutions was conducted as its own subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Seventeen observational studies, comprising 1889 HCC patients treated with ≤9 SBRT fractions, between 2003 and 2019, were included in the AD meta-analysis. The 3- and 5- year OS rates after SBRT were 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47-66%) and 40% (95% CI, 29-51%). The 3- and 5- year LC rates after SBRT were 84% (95% CI, 77-90%) and 82% (95% CI, 74-88%), respectively. Tumor size was the only prognostic factor for LC. Tumor size and region were significantly associated with OS. Five-year LC…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,889 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free