Evidence Hub

Immuno-chemoradiation for non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of factors influencing survival benefit in combination trials

Huei-Tyng Huang, D. Brand, John D. Fenwick, M. Hawkins

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2024

2,196 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

Adding immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has improved overall survival (OS) for inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Trials of cCRT-ICB are heterogeneous for factors such as tumor stage and histology, PDL1 status and cCRT-ICB schedules. We therefore aimed to determine the ICB contribution to survival across studies and identify factors associated with survival gain.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data were collated from cCRT-ICB clinical studies published 2018-2022 which treated 2196 NSCLC patients (99% stage III). Associations between 2-year OS and ICB, CRT, patient and tumor factors were investigated using meta-regression. A published model of survival following RT or CRT was extended to include ICB effects. The model was fitted simultaneously to the cCRT-ICB data and data previously compiled for RT/CRT treatments alone. The net ICB contribution ('OS gain') and its associations with factors were described by fitted values of ICB terms added to the model. Statistical significance was determined by likelihood-ratio testing.

RESULTS

The gain in 2-year OS from ICB was 9.9% overall (95% CI: 7.6%, 12.2%; p=0.018). Both OS gain and 2-year OS itself rose with increasing planned ICB duration (p=0.008, 0.002 respectively) and with tumor PDL1 ≥1% (p=0.034, 0.023). Fitted OS gains were also greater for patients with stage IIIB/C disease (p=0.021). OS gain was not associated with tumor histology, patient performance…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,196 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free