Evidence Hub

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Glottic Larynx: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

N. Razavian, Ralph B. D'Agostino, R. Shenker, R. Hughes

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2023

2,083 participants · 23 citations

Abstract

Purpose: Early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic larynx is commonly treated with 2-dimensional or 3-dimensional conventional radiation therapy (CRT). Despite its use in other head and neck cancers, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) remains controversial in this patient population. Methods and Materials: A systematic review was performed by querying 3 databases (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science) for articles published between December 1, 2000 and September 2, 2022. Included studies reported outcomes in at least 10 patients treated with IMRT for early-stage glottic cancer. Data were extracted and reported following PRISMA standards. Pooled outcomes were estimated using random-effects models. Primary outcome was the rate of local failure (LF) following IMRT. Secondary outcomes included rates of regional failure (RF) following IMRT and rates of LF and RF following CRT. Results: A total of 15 studies (14 retrospective, 1 prospective) consisting of 2083 patients were identified. IMRT was used in 873 patients (64% T1, 28% T2). Multiple treatment (partial larynx, single vocal cord carotid sparing) and image-guided radiation therapy techniques were used. The pooled crude rate of LF was 7.6% (95% confidence inverval [CI], 3.6%–11.5%) and actuarial LF rates at 3 and 5 years were 6.3% (95% CI, 2.2%–10.3%) and 9.0% (95% CI, 4.4%–13.5%), respectively. The pooled crude rate of RF after IMRT was 1.5% (95% CI, 0.5%−2.5%). On metaregression analysis, increased rate of LF…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,083 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free