Evidence Hub

Meta-Analysis of Trials of Partial Breast Irradiation

M. Goldberg, J. Bridhikitti, Aj Khan, P. McGale, T. Whelan

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2022

16,474 participants · 39 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is the delivery of radiotherapy (RT) limited to the tumor bed following breast conserving surgery (BCS). The results of recent trials of PBI compared to whole breast irradiation (WBI) have suggested conflicting results with respect to local control and toxicity. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess effectiveness of PBI and to compare the different techniques.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of aggregate data from published randomized trials was performed to examine the effectiveness of PBI compared to WBI in patients with invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. Relevant data were extracted. The primary outcome was any ipsilateral breast event (invasive or non-invasive). Secondary outcomes included acute and late toxicity. The results of randomized trials were pooled using a fixed effects model and the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

Fifteen trials involving 16,474 patients were identified. The majority of enrolled patients were > 60 years of age and had T1N0 grade I-II, disease treated with endocrine therapy. The percent of ipsilateral breast events was higher in patients treated with PBI compared to WBI [5.0% vs. 2.8%, risk ratio (RR)=1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-2.03]. Heterogeneity (p=0.0002) was observed between the 4 PBI techniques: external beam RT without CT planning [risk ratio (RR)=2.06, 95% CI 1.36-3.12]; brachytherapy (RR=1.21, 95% CI 0.65-2.25); intraoperative RT (RR=2.79, 95% CI 2.08-3.73); and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 16,474 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free