Evidence Hub

Prognostic importance of MRI detected extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer: a literature review and systematic meta-analysis

J. Tan, R. Carten, A. Babiker, M. Abulafi, A. Lord, G. Brown

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2021

56 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extramural venous invasion (EMVI) is recognised to be a poor prognostic factor in rectal cancer. There are well documented limitations associated with pathology detection of EMVI, including variable reporting and the inability for it to be used preoperatively to guide neoadjuvant treatment. MRI detected EMVI (mrEMVI) has been proposed as an imaging biomarker. This review assesses the prognostic significance of mrEMVI on survival outcomes and whether regression of mrEMVI after neoadjuvant therapy is associated with improvements in survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic search was carried out using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases using the search terms 'rectum', 'cancer', 'MRI' and 'outcomes'. A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using RevMan software. A qualitative review was performed.

RESULTS

7399 articles were identified, of which 33 were relevant to the review question. Following a qualitative assessment, 20 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Baseline mrEMVI positivity is associated with significantly worsened overall survival (HR 1.84 [95% CI 1.33-2.54] p = 0.0001) and significantly worsened disease-free survival (HR 2.41 [95% CI 2.02-2.89] p < 0.00001). After neoadjuvant treatment, a positive mrEMVI status is associated with a significantly worsened overall and disease-free survival. Only 3 papers specifically looked at mrEMVI regression, but the results show that a persistent mrEMVI positive…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free