Evidence Hub

Dose Escalated Radiotherapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme: An International Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 22 Prospective Trials

Raj Singh, E. Lehrer, Ming Wang, H. Perlow, Nicholas G Zaorsky, D. Trifiletti, J. Bovi, P. Navarria et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2021

2,198 participants · 39 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence is available on the utility of dose-escalated radiation therapy (DE-RT) +/- (TMZ) vs. standard-of-care RT (SoC-RT) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between DE-RT and SoC-RT.

METHODS

We utilized a PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE selection criterion to identify studies. The primary and secondary outcomes were 1-year OS and 1-year PFS, respectively. Outcomes and comparisons were subdivided based on receipt of TMZ and MGMT status. DE-RT was defined based on equivalent dose (EQD2) calculations. Random effects meta-analyses using the Knapp-Hartung correction, arcsine transformation, and restricted maximum likelihood method were conducted. Meta-regression was used to compare therapeutic (e.g. DE-RT and/or TMZ) and pathologic characteristics (e.g. MGMT methylation status) using the Wald-type test RESULTS: Across 22 published studies, 2,198 patients with GBM were included; 507 received DE-RT. One-year OS following DE-RT alone was higher than SoC-RT alone (46.3% vs. 23.4%; p=0.02) as was 1-year PFS (17.9% vs. 5.3%; p=0.02). No significant difference in 1-year OS (73.2% vs. 64.4%; p=0.23) or 1-year PFS (44.5% vs. 44.3%; p=0.33) between DE-RT+TMZ and SoC-RT+TMZ was noted. No difference in 1-year OS was noted between DE-RT+TMZ and SoC-RT+TMZ in either MGMT methylated (83.2% vs. 73.2%; p=0.23) or MGMT unmethylated (72.6% vs.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,198 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free