Evidence Hub

Should Short-course Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Be Applied for Low-lying Rectal Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Randomized Trials

J. Socha, L. Kairevičė, L. Kepka, W. Michalski, M. Spałek, K. Paciorek, K. Bujko

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2020

421 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend either long-course chemoradiation (LC) or short-course radiation (SC, 5 × 5 Gy) for rectal cancer before total mesorectal excision. However, they do not recommend SC for low-lying tumors. As early toxicity of SC is lower than that of LC, and postoperative complications as well as late toxicity are similar, the probable reason is a notion that for low-lying tumors LC may be more effective than SC in assuring local control.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized trials comparing SC with LC was performed to test the hypothesis that for low-lying tumors, LC is superior to SC in reducing the risk of local failure.

RESULTS

The systematic search identified four trials including in total 421 patients with tumors <5 cm from the anal verge; 221 were randomized to SC and 200 to LC. The meta-analysis showed that the difference in local failure rate between SC and LC was insignificant; the pooled odds ratio was 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.53-1.44, P = .59. Heterogeneity between trials was insignificant; I2 = 0.0%, P = .47.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis does not support the notion that LC given prior to total mesorectal excision is superior to SC in reducing the risk of local failure in low-lying tumors.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 421 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free