Evidence Hub

Radiation-induced erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer: A systematic review of pathophysiology, clinical radiobiology, and predictive modeling

Saraei P, Bagheri A, Danyaei A, Jafari M, Salek R, Hosseini S, Obeidavi I, Chegeni N

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2026

Abstract

Background: Radiation-induced erectile dysfunction (RIED) remains one of the most prevalent and distressing late toxicities among prostate cancer survivors. Despite advances in radiation therapy techniques, its underlying mechanisms, dose-response relationships, and predictive modeling strategies are not yet fully understood.

Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception to November 10, 2025. Eligible English-language studies included adult prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and reported evidence on erectile outcomes, pathophysiology, radiobiology, dose-response relationships or predictive modeling. Data were extracted using a standardized form, quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and findings were synthesized narratively according to PRISMA 2020.

Results: Thirty-nine peer-reviewed studies were included in the primary synthesis. RIED was associated with interacting neurovascular, smooth-muscle and endocrine mechanisms. Age, baseline erectile function, comorbidities, androgen deprivation therapy and radiation dose to erectile-relevant structures were key determinants of risk. Dose-response findings, particularly for the penile bulb, were inconsistent across studies because of heterogeneous contouring, endpoints, treatment techniques and confounder adjustment. No externally validated RIED-specific NTCP model was identified. Machine-learning, deep-learning and radiogenomic approaches…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free