Evidence Hub

Combining neuromelanin-sensitive MRI and quantitative susceptibility mapping for enhanced diagnosis and differentiation of parkinson's disease: A systematic review

Nikparast F, Danesh-Doust M, Zare H

Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging, 2026

2,228 participants

Abstract

Background: Loss of dopaminergic neurones and iron deposition in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) are two major pathological hallmarks of Parkinson's disease (PD). Such changes can be visualised by advanced techniques including neuromelanin-sensitive MRI (NM-MRI) and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). This systematic review investigates the diagnostic performance and methodological development of the integrated use of NM-MRI and QSM in PD.

Methods: The systematic search was performed in four databases (Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science) according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines until July 2026. Bias was assessed using QUADAS-2 and certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

Results: Seventeen studies with 2228 participants were included. Combined NM-MRI and QSM consistently showed reduced neuromelanin volume/contrast and increased iron deposition in the SNpc of PD patients compared to healthy controls. Multimodal integration yielded a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy (AUC values 0.86-0.99), and was able to successfully differentiate PD. Recent methodological advances included simultaneous acquisition sequences (e.g. MTC-GRE, STAGE, setMag) and AI-driven automated segmentation, which led to significantly reduced scan times and improved reproducibility.

Conclusion: The combination of NM-MRI and QSM has a synergistic effect and provides powerful complementary biomarkers for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PD.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,228 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free