Evidence Hub

Artificial intelligence for reducing metal artifacts in dental CBCT images: a systematic review

Soltani P, Iranmanesh P, Ebrahimzadeh F, Angelone F, Ponsiglione AM, Amato F, Moaddabi A, Armogida NG et al.

Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2026

Abstract

Objectives: The presence of metallic restorations introduces severe artifacts that compromise the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques in reducing metal artifacts in dental CBCT images.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across 6 databases up until April 2025, using keywords related to AI and CBCT artifact reduction. Studies were selected based on the eligibility criteria, focusing on AI models trained on human CBCT scans targeting dental regions. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment (using the QUADAS-2 tool) were performed independently by several reviewers accordingly.

Results: Ten studies published between 2019 and 2025 met the eligibility criteria. The majority of included studies had a high risk of bias. The most employed deep learning architectures were U-Net, GANs, and transformer-based models. Quantitative metrics like SSIM, PSNR, and RMSE demonstrated consistent improvements in image quality, while qualitative assessments confirmed superior artifact suppression and anatomical detail preservation compared to conventional methods. Transformer-based and physics-informed dual-domain networks performed superior to traditional image-only U-Nets in both quantitative fidelity and visual artifact suppression.

Conclusions: AI-based approaches show promising potential in enhancing CBCT image fidelity by effectively…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free