Can we really trust generative models in healthcare? A systematic review of uncertainty quantification in generative AI for medical imaging
Abstract
Background and objective: Generative AI is transforming medical imaging research through synthesis, enhancement, and reconstruction of clinical images. While these advances show promise in addressing data scarcity and supporting diagnostics, clinical adoption remains limited due to challenges in assessing the trustworthiness of generated content. This study aims to systematically evaluate the integration of uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods within generative models for medical imaging to enhance result reliability.
Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted, analyzing studies from January 2018 to December 2025 that combined generative models with UQ techniques in medical imaging. The search strategy covered major medical and computer science databases, with studies evaluated against predefined inclusion criteria focusing on implementation methodology and performance metrics.
Results: From the analysis of 41 eligible studies, 29 focused on radiology, 8 on microscopy, and 4 on optical coherence tomography. Across this heterogeneous body of evidence, integrating UQ was frequently associated with improved performance or with more informative reliability assessment, including reported gains in reconstruction quality, segmentation accuracy, and anomaly detection. Notably, 56% of studies (n=23) were published in 2025, indicating rapid field growth.
Conclusions: UQ integration represents a crucial advancement toward trustworthy generative AI systems…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 23 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Preliminary Toxicity Analysis of 3DCRT versus IMRT on the High Dose Arm of the RTOG 0126 Prostate Cancer Trial
- Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Clinical Outcomes from a Prospective Trial
- American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263: Standardizing Nomenclatures in Radiation Oncology
- Motion Management Strategies and Technical Issues Associated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Thoracic and Upper Abdominal Tumors: A Review from NRG Oncology
- High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial
- Highly efficient training, refinement, and validation of a knowledge-based plan quality control system for radiotherapy clinical trials
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.