Evidence Hub

The role of capacitive hyperthermia as an adjunct treatment in oncology: a systematic review of randomized phase III trials

Krahl P, Kuroda K, Contreras J, Crezee H, Gaipl US, Kok HP, Minnaar C, Navarro F et al.

International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Capacitive hyperthermia (cHT) has been established for superficial tumors but the efficacy of cHT for intermediate or deep-seated tumors remains a subject of debate. This review is an evaluation of the current clinical evidence on the effectiveness of cHT in the treatment of tumors that are located deeper within the body.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines of Phase III randomized controlled trials that included cancer patients of all ages and sexes with confirmed malignant tumors undergoing radiotherapy (RT) and/or chemotherapy (CT), with or without additional cHT. The literature search was conducted in PubMed and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), tumor response (TR; encompassing complete response (CR)), local control (LC), and cHT treatment-related toxicity (TRT).

Results: A total of nine randomized phase III trials were included in the study. The combination of cHT with RT and/or CT was found to improve both LC and OS in three out of five trials conducted in patients with cervical cancer. The analysis of both head and neck cancer trials demonstrated a marked increase in TR rates in cases where cHT was employed. Conversely, no such benefit was observed in non-small cell lung cancers and in a large multicenter cervical cancer trial. The treatment was well tolerated, with mild to moderate adverse events being the most common.

Conclusion: It…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free