Evidence Hub

Effects of exercise interventions on EEG alpha power across different populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liu F, Yang Y, Cao Y, Chi A, He X

Frontiers in psychology, 2026

497 participants

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the to evaluate the effects of exercise interventions on electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha-band power across different populations.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to June 25, 2026. Randomized controlled trials comparing an exercise intervention with a control condition and reporting EEG alpha-band power were included. Standardized mean differences were calculated as Hedges' g. Random-effects models using restricted maximum likelihood estimation and Knapp-Hartung adjustment were applied. Heterogeneity, prediction intervals, subgroup effects, intervention-duration meta-regression, influence diagnostics, recording-condition sensitivity analyses, and small-study effects were examined.

Results: Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 497 participants were included. Exercise interventions were associated with greater EEG alpha-band power than control conditions (Hedges' g = 1.23, 95% CI [0.44, 2.02], p = 0.005), although heterogeneity was considerable (I2 = 91.56%, τ2 = 1.49) and the 95% prediction interval included the null value (-1.55 to 4.01). No significant moderation effects were observed for alpha-power metric, population type, or exercise paradigm, and intervention duration was not associated with effect size in chronic-exercise studies (β = 0.103, p = 0.142). Leave-one-out analyses yielded consistently positive results. The…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 497 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free