Evidence Hub

Applicator reconstruction in cervical cancer brachytherapy: A systematic review of current methods, challenges, and AI-driven future directions

Sargazi V, Naseri S, Gholamhosseinian H, Momennezhad M

Brachytherapy, 2026

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate applicator reconstruction is a critical step in 3D image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT) for cervical cancer, directly influencing tumor control and organ-at-risk sparing. This systematic review evaluates the accuracy, efficiency, and clinical impact of applicator reconstruction methods, focusing on AI's potential to overcome existing limitations.

Methods and materials: Following PRISMA guidelines, 23 studies from MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Lilacs and Web of Science (up to May 2025) were analyzed. Evaluation metrics included geometric accuracy (tip error, Hausdorff distance), reconstruction time, and dosimetric parameters (D90 HR-CTV, D2cc OARs). Methods assessed spanned manual (e.g., MPR, scout-based), semi-automatic (library method, clustering algorithms), and AI-driven approaches (e.g., U-Net, Dilated-Supervised Deep U-Net, Attention-Gated networks). Special focus was placed on deep learning (DL) architectures and their ability to overcome metallic artifacts, partial-volume effects, and inter-operator variability.

Results: Manual methods exhibited significant limitations, with tip errors reaching 4.1 mm. Semi-automated approaches reduced variability (library-based methods: 0.89) and dosimetric consistency (D2cc deviations <3%). Notably, DL models like DSD-UNet and Attention-Gated U-Net reduced reconstruction time to <30 s per case while maintaining robustness against CT artifacts. However, challenges persist, including limited clinical validation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free