Comparative effectiveness of advanced radiotherapy techniques for brain cancers: A systematic review with an emphasis on dosimetric variability
Abstract
Background: Central nervous system (CNS) cancers pose a significant burden on global health. Radiotherapy remains central to treatment, yet optimal techniques for maximizing tumor control remain controversial due to dosimetric variability.
Methods: This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of six advanced radiation techniques in clinical practice. Following PRISMA guidelines, we analyzed 61 studies from the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus, covering the period from 2018 to 2024, which reported on tumor coverage, dose conformity, and organ at risk (OAR) sparing.
Results: Our analysis revealed several key findings: (1) Tomotherapy (TOMO) demonstrated optimal dose homogeneity (HI 0.024-0.3) for hippocampal-sparing applications; (2) Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) provided superior target coverage (CI 1.16-3.0) with greater efficiency (294 MU vs. Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT 572 MU)); (3) Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) excelled in pediatric cases, reducing hippocampal dose by 91 % (4.8 Gy vs. 52.5 Gy); (4) Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) enabled significant spinal cord sparing, with a Dmax reduction of 15 % compared to non-IGRT, through precise margin matching; (5) CyberKnife (CK) achieved remarkable accuracy for small lesions (<3 cm), maintaining the optic nerve dose below 2.02 Gy, although the treatment time averaged 220 min for larger targets. This review identified significant variability in OAR exposure across modalities (0.02 to 66.8 Gy),…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Preliminary Toxicity Analysis of 3DCRT versus IMRT on the High Dose Arm of the RTOG 0126 Prostate Cancer Trial
- Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Clinical Outcomes from a Prospective Trial
- American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263: Standardizing Nomenclatures in Radiation Oncology
- Motion Management Strategies and Technical Issues Associated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Thoracic and Upper Abdominal Tumors: A Review from NRG Oncology
- High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as a monotherapy for localized prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial
- Highly efficient training, refinement, and validation of a knowledge-based plan quality control system for radiotherapy clinical trials
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.