Evidence Hub

Dose Mapping using Image Registration for Reirradiation: A Systematic Review

C. Thiong'o, Angela Davey, A. Appelt, Madalyne Day, Pauline Dupuis, S. Monti, J. Pérez-Alija, T. Skopidou et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2025

15 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As reirradiation becomes increasingly common due to longer patient survival, accurately mapping previous radiation dose is essential to balance toxicity and tumour control. Image registration (IR) is widely used to align previous dose distributions with current anatomy. However, significant anatomical changes between treatment courses pose unique challenges, and it remains unclear how existing IR practices-largely developed for other contexts-translate to reirradiation. This systematic review aims to report on what is currently being done in the field regarding the use of IR for dose mapping in reirradiation scenarios, identify methodological gaps, and propose recommendations to improve reproducibility and clinical utility.

METHODS

We performed a PRISMA-compliant search for full-length articles (PubMed and Scopus) and conference abstracts (ScienceDirect and AAPM) that explicitly referenced IR for dose mapping in reirradiation. Each article was reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, with key data extracted on IR approaches and evaluation strategies.

RESULTS

As of mid-May 2025, 34 articles and 30 abstracts were selected. Most studies lacked comprehensive evaluation: about one-third reported geometric accuracy metrics, and few included dosimetric assessments or uncertainty estimation. Multimodal reirradiation, non-external beam techniques, and paediatric populations were notably underrepresented.

CONCLUSION

Based on the synthesis of current literature and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free