Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review Informing The Management of Symptomatic Brain Radiation Necrosis after Stereotactic Radiosurgery and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Recommendations

B. Vellayappan, M. Lim-Fat, R. Kotecha, A. De Salles, L. Fariselli, M. Levivier, Lijun Ma, I. Paddick et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2023

81 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radiation necrosis (RN) secondary to stereotactic radiosurgery is a significant cause of morbidity. The optimal management of corticosteroid-refractory brain RN remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To summarise the literature specific to efficacy and toxicity of treatment paradigms for patients with symptomatic corticosteroid refractory RN. To provide consensus guidelines for grading and management of RN on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).

METHODS

A systematic review of articles pertaining to treatment of RN with bevacizumab, laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), surgical resection, or hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) was performed. The primary composite outcome was clinical and/or radiological stability/ improvement (i.e., proportion of patients achieving improvement or stability with the given intervention). Proportions of patients achieving the primary outcome were pooled using random weighted-effects analysis, but not directly compared between interventions.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles were included, of which only two were prospective studies. Thirteen reports were relevant for bevacizumab, 5 for LITT, 5 for surgical resection and 1 for HBOT. Weighted effects analysis revealed that bevacizumab had a pooled symptom improvement/stability rate of 86% (95% CI: 77-92%), pooled T2 imaging improvement/stability rate of 93% (95% CI: 87 -98%), and pooled T1-post contrast improvement/stability rate of 94% (95% CI: 87 - 98%). Subgroup…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free