Evidence Hub

Tumor Control Probability Modeling and Systematic Review of the Literature of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

T. Royce, P. Mavroidis, Kyle Wang, A. Falchook, N. Sheets, D. Fuller, S. Collins, I. El Naqa et al.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2020

4,821 participants · 41 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND Dose escalation improves localized prostate cancer disease control and moderately-hypofractionationed external beam radiation is non-inferior to conventional fractionation. The evolving treatment approach of ultra-hypofractionation with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows possible further “biological-dose escalation” and shortened treatment time. METHODS The American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Biological Effects of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy/SBRT (WGSBRT) included a subgroup to study the prostate tumor control probability (TCP) with SBRT. We performed a systematic review of the available literature and created a dose-response TCP model for the endpoint of freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR). Results were stratified by prostate cancer risk group. RESULTS Twenty-five published cohorts were identified for inclusion with a total of 4,821 patients (2,235 low-risk, 1,894 intermediate-risk, and 446 with high-risk disease, when reported) treated with a variety of dose/fractionation schemes, permitting dose-response modeling. Five studies had a median follow-up over 5 years. Dosing regimens ranged from 32-50 Gy in 4-5 fractions, with total BED (α/β=1.5 Gy) between 183.1-383.3 Gy. At 5 years, we found in patients with low-intermediate risk disease, an EQD2 of 71 Gy (31.7 Gy in 5 fractions) achieved a TCP of 90% and an EQD2 of 90 Gy (36.1 Gy in 5 fractions) achieved a TCP of 95%. In patients with high-risk disease, an EQD2 of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,821 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free