Evidence Hub

A Systematic Review of the Clinical Implementation of Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MR)-Only Planning for External Beam Radiation Therapy

D. Bird, A. Henry, D. Sebag-Montefiore, D. Buckley, B. Al-Qaisieh, R. Speight

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2019

56 citations

Abstract

The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans alone for radiotherapy treatment planning (MR-only planning) has been highlighted as one method of improving patient outcomes. Recent technological advances have meant that introducing MR-only planning to the clinic is now becoming a reality, with several specialist radiotherapy clinics treating patients with this technique. As such, substantial efforts are being made to introduce this technique into wide-spread clinical implementation. A systematic review of publications investigating the clinical implementation of pelvic MR-only radiotherapy treatment planning was undertaken following the PRISMA guidelines. The Medline, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct, CINAHL and Web of Science databases were searched (timespan: all years to 2nd January 2019). Twenty six articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies were grouped into the following categories: 1. MR acquisition and synthetic-CT generation verification, 2. MR distortion quantification and phantom development, 3. Clinical validation of patient treatment positioning in an MR-only workflow and 4. MR-only commissioning processes. Key conclusions from this review are: i) MR-only planning has been clinically implemented for prostate cancer treatments; ii) A substantial amount of work remains to translate MR-only planning into wide spread clinical implementation for all pelvic sites; iii) MR scanner distortions are no longer a barrier to MR-only planning; however they must be…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free