Evidence Hub

Effects of non-surgical treatment modalities on peri-implantitis

Tang Z, Cao C, Sha Y, Lin Y, Wang X

Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi = Chinese journal of stomatology, 2002

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of local-delivery of 25% metronidazol gel and mechanical cleaning using ultrasonic carbon fiber tip on dental implants with peri-implantitis.

METHODS: 27 implants with peri-implantitis were randomly assigned to receiving either 25% metronidazol gel treatment or carbon fiber tip ultrasonic scaling. All parameters including plaque index (PLI), probing depth (PD) of pocket, sulcular bleeding index (SBI), and BANA enzyme analysis were measured at baseline, 1, 2, 6 and 12 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS: Statistically significant decrease (P < 0.05) in SBI, BANA test and PLI occurred in both treatment groups at all time intervals compared to baseline. PD had a decreasing tendency in both groups, but only metronidazole group reached statistically significant level (P < 0.05) at 2 and 6 week intervals compared to baseline. None of the treatment modalities produced any side effects on the implant and peri-implant tissues.

CONCLUSIONS: Both 25% metronidazol gel and mechanical cleaning using ultrasonic carbon fiber tip can be safely and effectively used in the treatment of peri-implant diseases.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free